|
S. No.
|
Topic
|
Citation
|
|
9
|
Infringement of Copyright
|
Appellants: Zee Telefilms Ltd. and Film and Shot and Anr. Vs. Respondent: Sundial Communications Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
2003 (5) Bom CR 404
|
|
10
|
Copyright shall subsist for original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic work
|
Appellants: The Indian Performing Rights Society Limited, A Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 through its Authorised representative Cum Chairman Mr. Hasan Kamaal Vs. Respondent: Branch Manager, The Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Saligramam, Branch Manager, The Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Anna Nagar. Muthooth Finance Private Limited, Kochi and Muthooth Finance Private Ltd., Kozhencherry AND Appellants: Muthooth Finance Private Limited Vs. Respondent: The Indian Performing Rights Society Limited. A Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 through its Authorized representative cum Chairman Mr. Hasan Kamaal,Branch Manager, The Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Saligramam, Branch Manager. The Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Anna Nagar and Muthooth Finance Private Ltd.
2010 (42) PTC 752 (Mad)
|
|
11
|
Guide Books and Copyright
|
Appellants: Syndicate of The Press of The Universtiy of Cambridge on Behalf of The Chancellor, Masters and School Vs. Respondent: B.D. Bhandari & Anr. AND Appellants: The Chancellor Masters And Scholars of The University of Oxford Vs. Respondent: Narendra Publishing House and Ors.
185 (2011) DLT 346
|
|
12
|
Infringement of Copyrights in the sound recordings
|
Appellants: Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Mr. Punit Coenka and Anr.
2009 (41) PTC 1 (Del)
|
|
13
|
Infringement of copyrighted work would occur when there is reproduction of the original work
|
Appellants: Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
(2010) ILR 6 Delhi 230
|
|
14
|
Unauthorized display of copyrighted material on websites
|
Appellants: Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Myspace Inc. and Anr.
MIPR 2011 (2) 303
|
|
15
|
A drawing would be an artistic work
|
Appellants: Societe Des Produits Nestle Vs. Respondent: Continental Coffee Ltd.
185 (2011) DLT 752
|
|
16
|
Author of the book enjoys several rights under the Copyright
|
Appellants: PEE PEE Publisher and Distributors (P) Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Neena Khanna and Anr.
2009 (40) PTC 515 (Del)
|
|
17
|
Copyright Infringement: Court shall grant injunction and damages
|
Appellants: Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Mallikarjuna Dairy Products Pvt. Ltd
2012 (49) PTC 346 (Del)
|
|
18
|
Person who sets question paper shall be author of work
|
Appellants: Jagdish Prasad Gupta Vs. Respondent: Parmeshwar Prasad Singh and Ors.
AIR 1966 Pat 33
|
|
19
|
Publication / Reproduction of Judicial Pronouncements would not Infringe Copyright
|
Appellants: Eastern Book Company and Ors. Vs. Respondent: D.B. Modak and Anr.
AIR 2008 SC 809
|
|
20
|
Privileged Information and Copyright Infringement
|
Appellants: Mr. Diljeet Titus, Advocate Vs. Respondent: Mr. Alfred A. Adebare and Ors. AND Appellants: Ms. Seema Ahluwalia Jhingan and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Titus and Co. and Ors.
130 (2006) DLT 330
|
|
21
|
Television Show and Copyright Infringement
|
Appellants: Anil Gupta and Anr. Vs. Respondent: Kunal Dasgupta and Ors.
AIR 2002 Delhi 379
|
|
|
|
Trademark
|
|
S. No.
|
Topic
|
Citation
|
|
22
|
Passing off and Trademark
|
Appellants: Yahoo!, Inc. Vs. Respondent: Akash Arora & Anr.
1999 II AD (Delhi) 229
|
|
23
|
Trademark
Infringement
|
Appellants: V.P. Moideen Vs. Respondent: E. Vasu and Anr.
MANU/K E/0192/1979
|
|
24
|
Infringement of Trademark
|
Appellants: Subhash Chand Bansal Vs. Respondent: Khadim's and Anr.
2012 I XAD (Delhi) 448
|
|
25
|
Groundless threats of legal proceedings by any person for infringement of Trademark
|
Appellants: Sh. Manoj Kumar Maheshwari trading as Supreme Suhag Sticker Bindi Vs. Respondent: Tips and Toes Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd.
MANU/DE/3071/2005
|
|
26
|
Nobody can claim trademark with respect to Generic word
|
Appellants: Schering Corporation and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Alkem Laboratories Ltd.
MIPR 2008 (3) 357
|
|
27
|
In Case of Passing off Injunction can be Granted
|
Appellants: Saha and Nath Biri Factory and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Sankar Biri Factory
2006 (Suppl.) GLT 616
|
|
28
|
Registered proprietor cannot sue a person who uses an identical Trademark from a date prior to the date of user
|
Appellants: S. Narendra Kumar and Co. Vs. Respondent: Everest Beverages and Foods Inudstries and Anr.
2008 (37) PTC 497 (Del)
|
|
29
|
Infringement of Trademark
|
Appellants: R. Gopalakrishnan Vs. Respondent: M/s. Venkateshwara
Camphor Works No. 14, Panneer Selvam Street Puliampatti Coimbatore-688 459
AIR 2001 Mad 92
|
|
30
|
To constitute infringement of trade mark, the mark in question should be an absolute replica of the registered trade mark
|
Appellants: Procter and Gamble Co. Vs. Respondent: Joy Creators and Ors.
178 (2011) DLT 228
|
|
31
|
Jurisdiction of Court in case of Infringement of Trademark
|
Appellants: Loreal (M/S.) Vs. Respondent: Mr. Dushyant Shah
2011 VIII AD (Delhi) 630
|
|
32
|
Registered trade mark is infringed by a person if he uses such registered trade mark as his trade name
|
Appellants: Infosys Technologies Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Adinath Infosys Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
AIR 2012 Delhi 46
|
|
33
|
In cases of similarity of name and identity of product the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction
|
Appellants: Cadbury India Limited and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Neeraj Food Products
MIPR 2007 (2) 269
|
